Skip to content

TECHNICAL TOOL

Grade equivalents

One designation — EN, AISI, UNS or JIS — and every standard equivalent, instantly.

Designation equivalences — 26 grades, to be cross-checked against the applicable product standard before purchase
EN numerical EN symbolic Common designation / ASTM UNS JIS Family Indicative PREN
1.4307 X2CrNi18-9 304L S30403 SUS304L Austénitiques 18–20 ¹
1.4404 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 316L S31603 SUS316L Austénitiques 24–26 ¹
1.4435 X2CrNiMo18-14-3 316L S31603 SUS316L Austénitiques 26–28 ¹
1.4571 X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2 316Ti S31635 SUS316Ti Austénitiques 24–26 ¹
1.4541 X6CrNiTi18-10 321 S32100 SUS321 Austénitiques 18–20 ¹
1.4462 X2CrNiMoN22-5-3 2205 S32205 SUS329J3L Duplex & super duplex 34–36 ¹
— ‡ — 2205 S31803 — Duplex & super duplex 31–38 ¹
1.4410 X2CrNiMoN25-7-4 2507 S32750 — Duplex & super duplex 42–43 ¹
1.4539 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 904L N08904 — Super austénitiques 34–36 ¹
1.4547 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 254 SMO S31254 — Super austénitiques 43–45 ¹
2.4856 NiCr22Mo9Nb Alloy 625 N06625 — Alliages nickel 50–54 ¹
3.7035 Ti2 Grade 2 R50400 — Titane does not apply to this family
CW352H CuNi10Fe1Mn 90/10 C70600 — Alliages de cuivre does not apply to this family
CW354H CuNi30Mn1Fe 70/30 C71500 — Alliages de cuivre does not apply to this family
1.4845 X8CrNi25-21 310S S31008 SUS310S Réfractaires 24–28 †
1.4835 X9CrNiSiNCe21-11-2 253 MA S30815 — Réfractaires 22–25 †
≈ 1.4438 ‡ X2CrNiMo18-15-4 TP317L S31703 SUS317L Austénitiques 28–33
no exact equivalent ‡ — TP347H S34709 SUS347H Nuances H et stabilisées 17–19 †
1.4162 X2CrMnNiN21-5-1 2101 S32101 — Duplex & super duplex 24–29
1.4362 X2CrNiN23-4 2304 S32304 — Duplex & super duplex 24–30
1.4016 X6Cr17 TP430 S43000 — Ferritiques & martensitiques 16–18
1.4521 X2CrMoTi18-2 444 / 18Cr-2Mo S44400 — Ferritiques & martensitiques 23–28
2.4858 — Alloy 825 N08825 — Alliages nickel 28–35 †
2.4816 — Alloy 600 N06600 — Alliages nickel 14–17 †
1.4876 — Alloy 800 N08800 — Alliages nickel 19–23 †
2.4819 — C-276 N10276 — Alliages nickel 75 (PREW) †
3.7235 — Ti Grade 7 R52400 — Titane does not apply to this family

≈ approximate equivalence, not an identity · italic: no exact equivalent, or not on record · † PREN calculable but not the deciding factor for this grade, see the caveat below · ‡ closest equivalent not used here, see the note below · ¹ usual value from the technical literature, not drawn from a product standard.

Equivalence notes (‡)

Duplex 2205 (S31803, ancienne désignation)
Pas de numéro EN propre : EN 10088 ne distingue pas S31803 de S32205 sous deux numéros — un seul, 1.4462, couvre la désignation moderne (voir cette entrée). Spec §4.2 : nuance sans reprise européenne dédiée.
347H — austénitique stabilisé au niobium, tenue au fluage
Aucun équivalent EN exact. Le 1.4912 (X7CrNiNb18-10) correspond au 347 et non au 347H ; le 1.4961 (X8CrNiNb16-13) est une nuance réfractaire au fluage, proche mais distincte.

PREN caveats (†)

310S — réfractaire austénitique 25-20
⚠️ PREN is NOT the relevant criterion for a heat-resistant grade. 310S is designed for hot oxidation resistance, not aqueous corrosion: without molybdenum, it isn't suited to chlorinated environments.
253 MA — réfractaire austénitique au silicium et cérium
⚠️ As with 310S, PREN is not the relevant criterion for a heat-resistant grade: 253 MA is designed for hot oxidation resistance, not aqueous corrosion, and its pitting resistance in aqueous environments is lower than standard austenitics.
347H — austénitique stabilisé au niobium, tenue au fluage
⚠️ PREN is not the deciding factor for this grade. 347H is chosen for creep resistance and stabilisation, not aqueous corrosion — its pitting resistance is at the level of a 304.
Alliage 825 — nickel-fer-chrome au molybdène, cuivre et titane
Indicative only. On an alloy with 38–46% nickel, performance isn't captured by PREN alone: nickel provides resistance to chloride stress corrosion cracking, and the molybdenum-copper pair provides resistance in reducing environments.
Alliage 600 — nickel-chrome à 72 % de nickel minimum
⚠️ A misleading indicator on this alloy. Its PREN of 14 to 17 is still lower than a 304L's, yet Alloy 600's performance comes from its 72% nickel content: resistance to chloride stress corrosion cracking, high-purity water and caustic environments.
Alliage 800 — nickel-fer-chrome pour service à chaud
⚠️ Not relevant: Alloy 800 is chosen for hot oxidation, carburisation and nitriding resistance, not aqueous corrosion.
C-276 — nickel-chrome-molybdène au tungstène
Tungsten requires the PREW formula, not PREN₁₆. For reference: 2507 at 42–43, 254 SMO at 43–45.

PREN notes

317L — austénitique à haute teneur en molybdène
Notably higher than 316L (24–26) thanks to molybdenum raised to 3–4%. That's the reason this grade exists.
2101 — duplex lean, faible teneur en nickel
Comparable to a 316L, with nickel reduced to 1.35–1.70% versus 10–14%. That's the whole logic of lean duplex: performance comes from nitrogen and manganese, not nickel.
2304 — duplex sans molybdène
Equivalent to 2101 in PREN, but via a different route: 2304 relies on chromium at 21.5–24.5% where 2101 relies on nitrogen and manganese.
430 — ferritique au chrome, sans nickel
Lower than 304L. 430 is not a corrosion-resistant grade for aggressive environments.
444 — ferritique au molybdène, stabilisé
Comparable to 316L, without a single gram of nickel. That's the whole logic of this grade.

These 26 grades are an excerpt, not a closed catalogue. My grade isn't listed →

How it works

The search field compares your input, normalised (case, spaces and dots ignored), against the five designation columns of each row. The full table stays in the page's HTML: the search filters rows already present, it does not load them from a server.

Limits of this table

Frequently asked questions

What does the designation 1.4404 mean?
It is the EN numerical designation (EN 10027-2 standard) for 316L. Every grade standardised in Europe carries a four-digit EN number after the 1. prefix (steels) or an alloy prefix for nickel and copper alloys.
Are the equivalences in this table 100% exact?
No: these are common equivalences, not identities. Two designations considered equivalent can have slightly different composition ranges — see the Limits section below.
Why do some JIS or UNS cells show a dash?
Some grades have no official designation in that reference system — this is the case for several special alloys in JIS, for example. A dash signals a real absence, never an unfilled value.
Can I search with or without dots and spaces?
"1.4404", "1 4404" and "14404" all return the same result. The search also ignores case — "sus316l" works as well as "SUS316L".
My grade is not in this table, what should I do?
This table covers 26 grades, not a closed catalogue — new entries are added as sessions progress. In the meantime, send us your designation directly through a quote request.